Variability Of
Earnings & Risk Assessment-
Anything that increases the variability of earnings (e.g., recession,
write-offs or poor business decisions) increases the unpredictability of
earnings and therefore increases the risk of the stock.
A focus on definitions of earnings other than reported
earnings may cause investors to underestimate the risk of a company.
If investors value a company “ Up “ the income statement and
as a result believe the company is of higher quality than it might truly be, the
company’s valuation will be higher & the cost of capital lower.
Investors should generally prefer to value companies “ Down “
the income statement in order to get a
better assessment of the risks of the company and to be compensated correctly
for those risks.
During the Technology Bubble when investors were valuing
companies on price-to-sales ratios, investors had simply handed the tug-of-war
rope to the companies without even putting up a fight.
Search For Grail-
There has been strong evidence amassed regarding the
efficacy of incorporating reported earnings into stock selection and style
rotation strategies , but investors continual search for the ‘ Holy Grail ‘
puzzles many.
It is yet to be found strategies based on any of these
supposedly superior measures that outperform reported earnings, but investors’
disbelief and their searches for “New & Improved “measures continue.
The Results-
During the last several years, valuing companies “Down “the
income statement would have clearly benefitted portfolio performance.
15-Year Annualized Return Of Selected Value Strategies
Low P/E – 15.8%
Low P/CF - 13.6% (Price To Cash Flow)
Low P/S – 11.4% (Price To Sales)
Average 12-Month Price Return Of Selected Value Strategies
Low EV/EBITDA – 12.3% (Enterprise Value To EBITDA)
Low P/E – 16.7%
Low P/CF – 14.8%
Low P/B- 13.7% (Price To Book Value)
Low P/S- 13%
DDM-12.7%
Summary-
One of the prime tenets is that reported earnings are the
ultimate drivers of stock prices.
Focusing on definitions of earnings other than reported
earnings may cause investors to underestimate the risk of a company.
A hypothetical “Tug-Of-War “exists between the investor and
company over a company’s valuation. Companies generally attempt to guide
investors to value their stocks as far up the income statement as possible in
order to better mask variability.
Why search for a new “Holy Grail “? We have yet to find
strategies based on any of these supposedly superior measures that outperform
reported earnings, but investors’ disbelief and their searches for “New &
Improved” measures continue.
Questions-
Q1. Does low P/E wok across the markets equally?
Q2. P/E may work best in the US, but may be flawed when
applied across borders. Enterprise value to EBITDA may work better. Your thoughts?
Q3. Were the ratios you used forward-looking or trailing?
Q4. If purchase of low P/E consistently works with and
across markets, what does that say about the efficiency of markets? Why does
the strategy work?
No comments:
Post a Comment